British expats in Portugal could face 40% UK inheritance tax on worldwide assets. Learn how to avoid costly mistakes, navigate forced heirship, and protect your family under the 2025 rules.

This is a div block with a Webflow interaction that will be triggered when the heading is in the view.
If you’re a company director, the final weeks before April 5 are probably costing you more than you realise.
Not because you’re making mistakes. But because you’re juggling too many decisions at once and making them in the wrong order. You’re thinking about salary, dividends, pension contributions, taper position, and carry-forward, often all in late March when the window for some decisions has already closed.
If you’ve ever got to May and realised you could have structured your tax position more efficiently, or if you’ve faced an allowance charge that felt preventable, you’ve experienced the cost of sequencing decisions incorrectly. This guide is written for you.
For company directors, tax-year end planning works best when pensions are handled before salary, dividends, and other profit extraction decisions. Pension contributions affect allowance, taper exposure, and adjusted income, so getting them right first makes the rest of the year-end planning easier to structure and less likely to trigger avoidable tax charges.
Employees face a simple deadline: their salary is paid by their employer on a fixed schedule, their bonus (if any) is determined by their manager, and they make personal pension contributions if they choose. Their year-end tax position is largely set by December. Directors face a completely different reality. They control the timing of their own salary withdrawals, they decide if and when a dividend is declared, they can structure pension contributions through the company or make them personally, and they can even make board decisions about profit extraction on the last day of the tax year if the documentation is credible.
This control is simultaneously a benefit and a curse. It means directors can optimise their tax position right up to April 5 if they plan carefully. It also means they often don’t plan until panic sets in around late March, at which point the truly tax-efficient moves are no longer available. Salary decisions can’t be made retrospectively (though they can be made prospectively and documented); dividend declarations require a board decision and potentially a resolution; pension contributions through salary sacrifice must be formally agreed before the salary is paid.
The pressure is compounded because directors often juggle multiple objectives simultaneously. They want to extract profits from the company efficiently (minimising corporation tax). They want to minimise their personal tax bill (balancing salary, dividends, and pensions). They want to build pension wealth (so they’re thinking about contribution room). They’re aware that the taper might apply to them (so they’re concerned about allowance). And they want to preserve flexibility for the rest of the year (so they’re reluctant to lock in decisions too early).
The mistake most directors make is treating tax-year end as a compliance deadline rather than a planning opportunity. They wait until the accountant sends a reminder in early April, then scramble to make decisions. By then, the most efficient moves are unavailable, and they’re forced to choose between suboptimal options.
The correct approach is to treat tax-year end as a decision window that opens in early February and closes on April 5. Decisions made in February can be refined or reversed if circumstances change. Decisions made in late March are constrained by what’s still achievable.
This section is already at ## level, no change needed.
The sequencing of decisions matters more than the individual decisions themselves. The correct sequence is: establish your pension allowance position, then optimise salary and dividends within that constraint, then decide on distributions and remaining profit extraction.
The reason pension comes first is that it affects your adjusted income, which affects your taper position, which affects how much you can contribute before facing a charge. Salary and dividends directly affect adjusted income, so they must be planned around your allowance, not the other way around.
Here’s the logic in practice. You’re a director with an expected profit of £300,000. You need to decide how to extract that. Your current salary is £150,000. You’re not sure whether the taper applies to you. The mistake is to declare a £100,000 dividend first (thinking “maximize profit extraction”), then realise in March that your adjusted income is now £250,000, which triggers the taper and shrinks your allowance to £40,000. Now you’re scrambling to decide whether to contribute to your pension (which increases adjusted income further and tightens the taper) or to accept the lower allowance and declare the dividend anyway.
The correct approach is to work backwards. First, calculate your pension allowance under various income scenarios. If your expected adjusted income is around £250,000, your allowance is approximately £40,000. Second, decide how much you want to contribute (say, £50,000). Third, determine whether you can make that contribution within your allowance. The answer is no-you’d breach by £10,000-unless you use carry-forward or adjust your income expectations.
Fourth, model the salary and dividend mix that gets you to your profit extraction goal while keeping adjusted income low enough that your allowance can accommodate your pension contribution. Perhaps you take £150,000 salary and £100,000 as a non-pensionable bonus (paid out of the £300,000 profit), and make a £50,000 employer pension contribution. This keeps salary at £150,000 but raises adjusted income to £200,000 (£150,000 salary + £100,000 bonus + £50,000 employer contribution-wait, that’s not right. Let me recalculate.
Actually, adjusted income for taper purposes doesn’t include the employer contribution directly-that’s threshold income. Let me clarify the sequencing more precisely.
You need to calculate threshold income first. Threshold income = salary + bonus + other employment/investment income + employer pension contributions. Once you know threshold income, you check if it exceeds £200,000. If it does, the taper applies.
Then, calculate adjusted income = threshold income + relief value of personal contributions you’ve made. This is the figure that actually determines your tapered allowance.
So the sequence is really:
First, estimate your threshold income. Will it be above £200,000? If yes, the taper will apply. If no, you have the full £60,000 allowance.
Second, if the taper applies, calculate your adjusted income. This depends on personal contributions you make. If you’re considering a £50,000 personal contribution, adjusted income = threshold income + £50,000.
Third, apply the taper formula to see what allowance you’re left with.
Fourth, decide whether total contributions (employer plus personal) fit within that allowance. If not, explore carry-forward or reduce contributions.
Fifth, then decide on salary and dividends, knowing your pension situation is sorted.
This sequence works because you’re not guessing about your allowance; you’re calculating it based on a scenario you’ve modelled. And because pension contributions are now known, you can optimise salary and dividends around that fixed figure.
Employer contributions are paid by the company directly into the pension scheme. They reduce the company’s taxable profit (so they’re corporation tax-deductible), and they don’t count as the employee/director’s personal income (so they’re not subject to income tax). Timing-wise, they can be made anytime during the tax year, but if they’re made via salary sacrifice, they must be formally agreed before the salary is earned.
Personal contributions are made from your own money (after-tax if you’re not getting relief). The relief is claimed on self-assessment, so the contribution itself doesn’t need to be physically made until the deadline for amending self-assessment (which is typically January 31 following the tax year, but the tax year ends April 5). However, it’s prudent to make contributions before the tax year ends if you can, because it locks in the contribution and reduces any risk of a dispute about what year it relates to.
The tax efficiency difference is significant. If you’re a higher rate taxpayer and a company owner, an employer contribution costs the company £1,000 in lost profit, which means £190 in corporation tax is forgone (at the current 25% rate, and deducting the contribution value). This means the £1,000 contribution only “costs” the company £810 in actual cash. A personal contribution costs you £1,000 from after-tax income, but you claim relief and recover £40-45% of it through self-assessment, netting about £550 in refund. The net cost is £450. The employer contribution is more tax-efficient from the company’s perspective, but the personal contribution is more tax-efficient from your personal perspective (you recover 45% of relief).
However, if you’re subject to the taper, the calculus changes. An employer contribution increases threshold income (potentially worsening the taper), while a personal contribution increases adjusted income (also worsening the taper). Neither is “better”-they have different effects on different parts of your tax position. The key is to model both and see which achieves your objectives with the least cost.
Timing matters because employer contributions must be “intended” to be paid before the end of the accounting period and must have a basis in a board decision. If the company makes an employer contribution in June on April 2, the tax authority will accept it as a tax year end contribution if it’s credible (i.e., there’s a board decision dated before year-end, and the contribution is actually paid shortly after). But if the contribution is made in November with no prior board decision, the tax authority may reject it as a year-end arrangement.
Personal contributions have more flexibility on timing. You can make them after year-end and still allocate relief to the tax year that just closed. But practically, if you’re going to make a personal contribution, making it before April 5 means it’s clearly part of that tax year.
{{INSET-CTA-1}}
The salary versus dividend decision is a classic director tax puzzle. In simple terms, a salary is deductible against company profit (reducing corporation tax), but it’s subject to income tax and National Insurance on you personally. A dividend is paid from post-tax profit (no corporation tax deduction), but it’s only subject to income tax at dividend rates (not National Insurance).
At current tax rates (25% corporation tax, 20% basic rate income tax, 8% dividend tax, 8-10% National Insurance), the crossover point is roughly £50,000 of salary. Below that, salary is often more tax-efficient because National Insurance savings on the company side offset the higher personal rate. Above £50,000, dividends become more efficient because you avoid National Insurance entirely.
For directors planning at year-end, the question is: should I crystallise this year’s profit as salary, bonus, or dividend? The answer depends on your personal tax position (are you a basic rate or higher rate taxpayer?), your company’s profit position (can it absorb a higher payroll cost?), and your allowance position (does paying salary increase your taper burden?).
Here’s a practical scenario. You’re a director of a company with £150,000 profit after operating costs. You want to extract £100,000 to yourself personally. Your current salary is £50,000. Your adjusted income is estimated at £220,000 (putting you in the taper). You’re considering two approaches.
Approach A: Increase salary to £150,000 (a £100,000 increase). Threshold income rises to £250,000 (assuming you also have £50,000 of other income). Adjusted income rises to £280,000 (assuming a £30,000 personal contribution you’re planning). Allowance shrinks to £25,000. Your contribution of £30,000 breaches by £5,000, triggering a £2,250 charge. National Insurance on the salary increase: roughly £12,000.
Approach B: Keep salary at £50,000 and declare a £100,000 dividend. Threshold income stays at £150,000 (the salary stays, the dividend doesn’t add to threshold income, and there’s no employer contribution). Adjusted income with your £30,000 personal contribution is £180,000. Your allowance is the full £60,000. Your contribution fits within allowance with no charge. National Insurance is £0 on the dividend (you avoid NI). However, the company pays corporation tax on its profit before the dividend, so the effective cost of extracting £100,000 is higher than salary.
The calculation would be: company profit £150,000; corporation tax at 25% = £37,500; available for dividend = £112,500. To extract £100,000, you need only £112,500 profit available, so this works. National Insurance saved: £12,000 on the salary alternative. Pension allowance charge saved: £2,250. Total benefit: ~£14,250. The corporation tax cost difference is roughly £25,000 (the company pays 25% on £100,000 under the dividend route versus deducting £100,000 under the salary route), so the net position is complex.
However, what’s clear is that the taper and National Insurance are working against the salary approach, while the dividend approach protects your allowance and avoids NI. For taper-affected directors, the dividend approach is often preferable.
The point for tax-year end planning is this: review your salary and dividend mix before calculating contributions. Decide what gross profit extraction achieves your personal wealth goals, then structure it tax-efficiently (salary, bonus, or dividend), then layer on pension contributions around that. The sequence of analysis should be profit extraction first, then pensions-not the other way around.
Directors often ask: does it matter if I extract profit now versus later? The answer is yes, and the tax-year end is a meaningful time to make that decision.
If your company’s accounting year matches the calendar (year-end December 31), then profit generated in December is taxed in the year ending December 31, and corporation tax is due nine months later (September 30 following year-end). If you declare a dividend in April, it’s paid from profit already taxed. If you declare a dividend in December, it’s paid from profit that won’t be taxed until next year. However, corporation tax rates are the same regardless, so timing doesn’t change the rate.
What does matter is cash flow and certainty. If you declare a dividend in April of a tax year when you’re certain of your company’s position, you know what profit is available. If you wait until later, you might make additional sales or incur unexpected costs that change the position.
For pension purposes, timing is less critical-a dividend declared in April of the company year is still allocated to your personal tax year that ends April 5, so it counts toward your threshold income for that year’s taper calculation. A salary paid in April counts immediately.
The practical point is to make dividend declarations and distributions before year-end (or as soon as is certain and credible after year-end) so you have clarity for your personal tax planning. If you’re unsure of company profit, don’t declare a dividend until you are; undeclared dividends can’t be recovered as improper distributions.
If you’re uncertain about your allowance position and whether you’ll breach, carry-forward is your safety valve. Carry-forward allows you to use unused allowances from the previous three tax years to absorb breaches in the current year.
Here’s how it works in practice. In the previous tax year, your allowance was £50,000, but you only contributed £35,000. You have £15,000 of unused allowance. In the current year, your allowance is £25,000, but you want to contribute £40,000. You can apply the £15,000 carry-forward from last year, reducing your breach from £15,000 to £0.
Carry-forward is claimed through your self-assessment tax return or by notifying your pension scheme. It requires proper records of prior-year allowance and contributions, which many directors don’t maintain. If you’re uncertain whether you have carry-forward available, contact your pension provider or review your prior-year documents.
The strategic value of carry-forward is that it allows you to make year-end decisions without perfect certainty of your allowance. If you’re close to breaching and uncertain whether your final bonus or dividend will push you over, you can choose to contribute anyway, knowing that if you do breach, you can apply carry-forward and pay no charge.
However, carry-forward can only be applied once the full year position is known. You can’t assume it’s available and avoid making a decision at year-end.
The Money Purchase Annual Allowance (MPAA) is triggered when you take money flexibly from a money purchase pension (like a personal pension or SIPP). Once triggered, your annual allowance drops to £10,000, and you can’t carry forward unused allowance.
Many directors don’t realise they’ve triggered the MPAA because they may have taken a withdrawal years ago and forgotten about it. When planning contributions at year-end, it’s critical to confirm whether you’re subject to the MPAA. If you are, contributions are capped at £10,000, and planning becomes much simpler (you either contribute the £10,000 or you don’t).
If you’ve triggered the MPAA, you should notify your pension scheme so that your contributions are monitored correctly. Some directors discover they’re subject to MPAA only after they’ve breached their allowance, which is unnecessarily painful.
A simple check: have you ever accessed a personal pension pot flexibly (taken cash out, invested via drawdown, started flexible drawdown)? If yes, you may be subject to MPAA. Contact your pension provider to confirm.
Employer pension contributions, salary changes, and dividend declarations all require credible board decisions. From a tax perspective, credibility means the board decision must be documented (minutes or a resolution), dated before the end of the tax year (or contemporaneously after for payments made shortly after), and actually implemented.
The tax authority is skeptical of board decisions made on April 3 that purport to have been made “as of” April 1. It’s not impossible-you can make retrospective decisions-but you need strong documentation. A safe approach is to make board decisions by late March (so they’re clearly timely) and implement them before April 5 if possible.
For salary, a board resolution to increase salary from £150,000 to £180,000 (effective April 1) is credible if documented before year-end. The actual payment can be made after year-end as long as the decision is clear.
For employer contributions, the resolution should state the amount, the scheme, and the intention to pay (and ideally the actual payment date if it’s imminent). If the contribution is paid in June, the authority might question it, but if there’s a clear board decision from March and a good explanation (e.g., “paid in June pending receipt of bank facility”), it’s typically accepted.
For dividends, the minutes should state the amount per share, the number of shares, the total dividend, and the date payment will be made. Dividends can be declared on the last day of the tax year if the board minutes are clear.
The point for directors is: if you’re considering making a decision at year-end, ensure it’s properly documented. Scribbled notes or email discussions don’t count. A formal resolution in your board minutes (even if you’re a sole director) is the right approach.
{{INSET-CTA-2}}
Common year-end mistakes include the following:
Rushed contributions made on April 4 because you suddenly remember you have allowance room often breach allowance (because you didn’t calculate correctly), exceed employer contribution deadlines (because you missed the window), or don’t achieve their tax purpose (because salary sacrifice deadlines have passed).
Structured planning-where you model your position in February, confirm your allowance and carry-forward status, decide on contributions and salary mix, document board decisions, and implement before year-end-means you achieve your objectives efficiently and with confidence. There’s no scramble in late March. There’s no April 5 panic. There’s no July shock when the allowance breach letter arrives.
The difference in outcome is often £5,000-£10,000 in unnecessary tax charges, missed National Insurance savings, and failed pension planning goals. All because the decisions were made in the wrong order or too late.
For directors genuinely planning, the ideal timeline follows this sequence:
This sequence avoids panic, achieves tax efficiency, and gives you and your accountant clarity to work with.
Not reliably. A salary increase must be decided by the board and then paid according to that decision. You can decide in March to increase salary going forward, but retrospectively increasing salary from April requires a board decision that clearly states it’s retroactive. This is riskier than making the decision in April itself. For cleanest tax treatment, decide salary in March and implement it in April.
It counts toward the tax year in which it was declared, even if it’s paid later. A dividend declared on April 4 is part of the tax year ending April 5. However, you must have adequate profit and a credible board decision. If you don’t have board minutes documenting the dividend, don’t declare it that late.
Yes, but with conditions. If it’s via salary sacrifice, the salary sacrifice must be formally agreed before April 5. If it’s a direct employer contribution, you can make the contribution after year-end (e.g., in April or June) as long as it’s clearly connected to the tax year being closed and there’s a board decision to support it. Generally, contributions made within 30 days of year-end are clearly related and accepted. Later than that, and you need documentation.
The contribution itself can be made up until January 31 following the tax year (so for the 2025/26 tax year, by January 31, 2027). Relief is claimed on self-assessment. However, it’s safer to make the contribution before April 5 so there’s no question about which tax year it relates to.
You should estimate realistically based on current expectations, not best-case or worst-case scenarios. If your bonus is typically 50% of salary and you’ve earned half your salary by February, estimate accordingly. Once your bonus is confirmed, recalculate. If your estimate was materially wrong, adjust your contribution or carry-forward planning.
For employer contributions, you need to notify your scheme and ensure they can accept the contribution. For personal contributions, you typically just need to inform your provider (for documentation purposes), but the contribution can be made without prior approval. Contact your provider to confirm their requirements.
Arun Sahota is a UK-regulated Private Wealth Partner at Skybound Wealth, advising high-net-worth and ultra-high-net-worth families, business owners, and senior executives with complex UK and cross-border financial planning needs.
This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Tax rules, thresholds, and allowances may change. Individual circumstances vary. Professional advice should always be sought before making financial decisions.
A single planning session can help you:


Ordered list
Unordered list
Ordered list
Unordered list
A focused conversation can help you: