Keeping large amounts of cash in the bank can quietly cost athletes through inflation, low interest and FSCS limits. Learn how to protect and plan your cash.

This is a div block with a Webflow interaction that will be triggered when the heading is in the view.
I spent a long time inside dressing rooms, first as a player and a captain and later as a coach, and one lesson stands out above almost everything else about money and career: the people you gather around you matter more than any single contract you ever sign.
A playing career is short, intense and unusually public. The money can arrive quickly, the decisions come thick and fast, and the demands on your time leave very little room to become an expert in contracts, tax, property and investing all at once. That is exactly why the strongest careers are rarely built by one brilliant person acting alone. They are built by a small group of trusted people, each doing their own job well, each pulling in the same direction, with the player’s long-term interests sitting firmly in the middle.
This piece is written for two audiences at the same time. If you are an agent, a player-care manager, a club welfare officer or a family liaison, I want to talk about how the roles around a player fit together and how bringing the right people to the table makes you more valuable, not less. And if you are the player, I want to help you understand who does what, why their incentives differ, and how you can assemble and coordinate a team that actually serves you for decades, not just for the length of your current deal.
The same picture holds across football, rugby, tennis and golf. A tennis player managing a global schedule alone, a golfer building a calendar of events, a rugby forward facing a shorter and more physical career: the sports differ, but the principle does not. The people around you should complement one another, not compete for control, and the player should never be left carrying every decision by themselves.
Confusion usually starts because the roles blur in everyday conversation. So let me set them out plainly, in general terms.
It is worth adding that these roles are not always separate people. At a smaller club, one welfare officer might cover several of these needs, while a top player might have a large team with overlapping specialists. What matters is not the number of people involved, but that every function is genuinely covered by someone competent, and that no single function is quietly neglected because everyone assumed somebody else had it in hand.
{{INSET-CTA-1}}
Here is the part that too often goes unspoken. Every role around a player has its own incentives, and that is not sinister, it is simply how the arrangement works. The honest move is to name it.
An agent frequently earns when deals are done, which naturally focuses attention on the next contract or transfer. That energy is genuinely valuable when you need someone driving hard on your behalf. A player-care manager is usually employed by a club or agency, so their day-to-day loyalty sits partly with that organisation even while they care deeply about you. A financial adviser, if they are independent and regulated, is paid to plan for your long term, which pulls in a different and complementary direction from the deal-by-deal rhythm of representation.
None of this makes anyone the villain. The point is the opposite. When you can see clearly what motivates each person, you stop expecting one individual to do everything, and you start to appreciate why a balanced team protects you better than any single trusted figure ever could.
The healthiest teams are open about this. I have always found that putting the incentives on the table honestly builds far more trust than pretending everyone wants precisely the same thing. Players are not naive. They respect straight talk about who is paid for what, and they lean in when the people around them are secure enough to be honest about it.
Sometimes an agent or a player-care manager worries that bringing in a financial adviser is a threat, as if it signals distrust or invites someone to tread on their patch. In my experience the opposite is true, and the best professionals in the game already know it.
A good, regulated, independent adviser does not negotiate your contract, does not manage your club relationships and does not try to run your daily life. They take on the part of the picture that agents and welfare staff are usually not regulated, trained or resourced to handle: long-term financial planning, protection, pensions and the discipline of making money last. That is a specialist job, and handing it to a specialist frees everyone else to do what they do best.
There is a compliance point I never gloss over. A regulated financial adviser operates under rules designed to protect you, and money held with an authorised firm carries protections such as FSCS cover of £120,000 per person per authorised firm, with temporary high-balance cover up to £1.4m for up to six months after an event like a house sale. That framework exists for a reason, and it is one of the clearest ways to tell a genuine planning relationship from an informal tip passed around a dressing room. Nothing here is personal advice, and your own position always needs looking at properly, but the principle stands: a good adviser strengthens the team, they do not stalk it.
There is a myth that a team of advisers is only for the elite earner. It is not. The player on a Scottish Championship wage of around £600 a week, or an English League One or League Two wage in a similar range, needs a well-built team just as much as the one on £20,000 a week at the very top clubs, arguably more, because there is less margin for a mistake. Planning is not about how much you earn, it is about how well what you earn is handled.
Footballers have one advantage worth understanding. Through the English Professional Footballers’ Pension Scheme, a defined-contribution pension funded by a club transfer levy of around £7,200 per player per year as of August 2025, and not deducted from your wages, you are auto-enrolled into long-term saving when you sign a new professional contract. Up to 25% can usually be taken tax-free later, within the wider lump sum allowance, and the scheme has its own normal retirement age. It is a genuine head start, but only footballers get it, and it is not a plan on its own. Players in rugby, tennis and golf have no equivalent scheme handed to them, which makes deliberate, self-directed planning even more important in those sports.
The odds themselves argue for building a team early. Studies suggest only around 1% of under-9 academy players and roughly 4% of teenage academy players ever reach the top tier. For most young players, the professional window is short and uncertain, which is exactly why the money made during it has to be protected by people who know what they are doing. A strong team is not a luxury you earn once you are established. It is one of the things that helps you become, and then stay, established.
Now I want to speak directly to the agents, player-care managers and liaisons reading this, because there is a real professional edge here.
The representatives who last in this industry, the ones players stay with for years and recommend to teammates, are almost always the ones who bring good people to the table rather than trying to be everything themselves. When you introduce a player to a regulated adviser, a trustworthy accountant or the right lawyer, you are not giving away control. You are demonstrating that you think about their whole life, not just your slice of it.
I have watched this play out on both sides of the touchline. The professionals who hoard control tend to burn bright and fade. The ones who build a proper team around each player, and coordinate it generously, tend to have careers as long and as respected as the players they serve. Bringing the right people around a player is not a threat to your value. It is the clearest proof of it.
Now to the player. Building this team is not complicated, but it does take intention. Here is how I would approach it.
Start with clarity on roles. Before you add anyone, be clear in your own mind about what you need from each seat at the table: who negotiates, who looks after your welfare, who plans your money, who handles technical tax and legal detail. When you know the roles, you stop asking one person to be all of them.
Choose for the long term, not the loudest voice**.** The most impressive person in the room is not always the one who will serve you best in ten years. Look for people who ask about your family, your plans after playing and your values, not only your next contract.
Insist on the right credentials where they matter**.** For financial planning, that means a properly regulated, ideally independent adviser. For tax, especially anything cross-border, it means a qualified specialist. These are not areas for a well-meaning friend or an informal recommendation, however genuine the person offering it.
Coordinate, do not silo**.** The real value appears when your team talks to one another. Your adviser understanding your contract structure, your agent aware of your long-term financial plan, your accountant and adviser comparing notes: that is where mistakes get caught and opportunities get spotted. You do not have to manage all of this yourself, but you should expect your professionals to communicate, with your permission, in your interest.
A quick word on cross-border situations, because they catch players out constantly. If you move between countries to play, or you are a foreign athlete building a career in the UK, the tax and residency questions become genuinely complex and highly fact-specific. As one example, a new arrival to the UK who was not UK-resident in any of the previous 10 consecutive tax years may be able to claim, for their first four years of UK residence, exemption from UK tax on foreign income and gains under the regime that replaced the old non-dom rules from 6 April 2025, though the claim must be made each year and the outcome depends heavily on your circumstances. Even where you live within the UK matters: income tax is devolved, so a player whose main home is in Scotland is taxed under Scottish rates that differ from the rest of the UK. This is precisely where a coordinated team of specialists earns its keep, and where acting on a half-understood tip can be very costly. Do not treat any general rule as certain for your own situation. Get it looked at properly by someone qualified in the relevant countries.
{{INSET-CTA-2}}
After years around this, I can usually tell within a few conversations whether a player has a healthy team or a fragile one. A few signals are worth watching for, whichever side of the relationship you sit on.
If you are a player and something feels off, trust that instinct and ask questions. If you are a professional and you recognise the healthy signals in your own work, protect them, because they are the foundation of the reputation that will carry your career long after any single client moves on.
So where does structured financial planning sit inside all of this? Not as a rival to your agent or your player-care manager, but as the piece that holds the long term together while they focus on the present.
This is why serious players often seek a conversation, not a product.
If any of this resonates, the next step is not a commitment, it is simply a conversation about how the financial piece of your team could fit alongside the people already around you.
This is not about:
The people you gather around you really do matter more than any single contract you sign. Choose them with care, coordinate them generously, and let each of them do what they do best.
Not at all. An agent negotiates your playing contracts and manages club, transfer and commercial relationships, while a regulated financial adviser focuses on protecting and planning what you earn over the long term. They have different roles. A good agent should recognise the value of having a trusted adviser helping you make financially informed decisions.
A player-care or welfare manager focuses on the human side of professional sport, including housing, relocation, family needs, settling into a new environment and general wellbeing. A financial adviser focuses on areas such as cash-flow planning, pensions, investments, protection and long-term financial planning. The roles complement each other rather than compete.
Their incentives can differ, and that is normal. Agents may earn when contracts, transfers or commercial deals are completed, while player-care professionals are typically employed by a club or agency. An independent financial adviser is focused on your longer-term financial position. The key is transparency: everyone should understand their role, how they are paid and where their responsibilities begin and end.
No. Financial planning is about how effectively your money is managed, not simply how much you earn. A player on a modest professional wage may have less room for financial mistakes than a top earner. Because sporting careers can be short and uncertain, having the right people around you can be valuable at every stage of a career.
Start by asking who they work for, how they are paid and who else they work with. Understand whether they are employed by your club or agency or work independently for you. For financial advice, check the relevant regulatory status and qualifications. It is also a positive sign when a professional is comfortable working alongside your existing advisers rather than trying to isolate you from them.
Cross-border tax and residency can be complex and highly fact-specific. You should work with a qualified tax professional who understands the relevant countries and your individual circumstances. UK tax rules have changed significantly since 6 April 2025, including the replacement of the previous non-dom framework. Do not rely on informal advice or assume that a general rule applies to your situation.
This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Financial planning outcomes depend on individual circumstances, residency, tax status, and objectives. Professional advice should always be sought before making financial decisions.
A focused discussion with Christophe can help you:

The best time to build the right team is early, while decisions are still ahead of you rather than behind you; leaving it late narrows your options and can cost you dearly.
A short, honest conversation with Christophe Berra can help you understand how the financial part of your team fits alongside everyone already in your corner.

Ordered list
Unordered list
Ordered list
Unordered list
In a private session with Christophe Berra, you’ll: