Keeping large amounts of cash in the bank can quietly cost athletes through inflation, low interest and FSCS limits. Learn how to protect and plan your cash.

This is a div block with a Webflow interaction that will be triggered when the heading is in the view.
I spent my career in football, forty-one caps for Scotland and a captain’s armband at Hearts, so I know from the inside what it is to earn well for a while and then have the game hand you an ending you did not choose. Golf looks like a different world, but the money underneath it rhymes, and the mistakes are cousins.
A salaried footballer, for all the pressure of the job, has one thing a touring golfer does not: a wage. It lands on the same day every month, tax is taken off before it reaches the bank, and someone in an office has already dealt with the paperwork. A professional golfer lives the opposite life. The income is prize money and endorsements, not a salary. It is earned in bursts, across many countries, often with tax pulled off at source in each of them, and almost none of it arrives with the UK tax already settled.
That single difference changes everything about how the money should be handled. You are, in the eyes of most tax systems, running a business that happens to have you as its only asset. Nobody deducts your tax. Nobody smooths your income. Nobody tells you that the cheque from a good week needs to carry you through three bad ones. The freedom is real, and so is the exposure.
Tennis players know this rhythm exactly, and so does any athlete whose living comes from entering events rather than drawing a wage. Even football and rugby internationals brush against the same world the moment they play, or earn image-rights income, outside their home country. The cross-border theme in this piece is golf-led because golf lives it most purely, but the principles travel across sports.
A few things make the golfer’s financial life distinctive:
None of this is a reason to panic. It is a reason to build a structure early, while the good years are paying for it.
The hardest habit to learn, and the one that protects everything else, is to stop treating a big cheque as this month’s income. It is a year’s income, or two, arriving at once. Spend it as if it will repeat next week and you set a lifestyle that a quiet season cannot feed.
The single most useful mental move is to pay yourself a wage. Decide, with an adviser who understands volatile income, what a sensible monthly figure looks like for your life, and then let the lumpy winnings flow into a reserve that pays that steady figure out to you. The reserve absorbs the swings so your household does not have to. In a strong year the reserve fills; in a lean one it does the job it was built for.
That approach is the heart of turning a handful of unpredictable big years into a steady, liveable income, and it is the difference between a career that funds a life and one that merely funded a few expensive seasons.
A workable budgeting frame for a touring professional tends to include:
The order matters. Lifestyle is last, not first. A player who inverts that order can look wealthy for three years and be exposed in the fourth, which is the exact trap the companion piece on whether your lifestyle survives when the paycheck stops is written to help you avoid.
{{INSET-CTA-1}}
Here is the part that catches self-employed athletes hardest. When you were paid a wage, the tax was gone before you saw the money, so the figure in your account was genuinely yours. When you are self-employed, the figure in your account is not yours. A chunk of it belongs to a tax authority, and it will be asked for later, often long after the temptation to spend it has passed.
The discipline is unglamorous and non-negotiable: every time money lands, move the tax portion out of reach before you do anything else. Treat the tax pot as though it belongs to someone else, because it does. This is the whole discipline of setting money aside from income that arrives with no tax taken off, and players who master it sleep well when the demand comes.
How much to set aside is genuinely fact-specific, because it depends on where you are resident, how much you earn in a year, what has already been withheld abroad, and what deductible costs you carry. I am not going to put a single percentage on it, because the honest answer is that it varies and getting it wrong in either direction hurts. Set aside too little and you face a bill you cannot meet; set aside far too much and you starve the reserve that smooths your income. The right figure is a conversation with an accountant who does this for touring athletes, revisited as your earnings change.
A few UK anchors are worth knowing, because for a UK-resident player they frame the domestic bill:
Those are the rules I can state plainly. What I cannot state plainly is how they interact with tax already paid abroad, because that is where the cross-border machinery takes over, and that machinery needs a specialist.
Play a tournament in another country and you have, in most cases, earned income in that country. Many jurisdictions tax non-resident athletes on money earned within their borders, and a good number of them collect that tax at source, meaning the organiser or promoter withholds a slice of your prize money or appearance fee before it is paid to you. You can finish a strong week abroad and receive noticeably less than the headline figure because tax has already been taken.
The reason this gets complicated is that the same income can fall within the reach of more than one country at once: the country where you earned it, and the country where you are tax-resident. Countries deal with this overlap through a web of tax treaties and relief mechanisms that are designed to stop the same money being fully taxed twice, but the way they apply to a specific athlete, a specific event and a specific type of income is intricate and genuinely fact-specific.
I want to be very careful here, and the spec I write under is careful too. I am not going to quote foreign tax rates, because they vary by country, by year and by the type of income, and a number I put in an article could be wrong for your exact situation. What I will say plainly is this:
That last point is the one athletes underestimate most. Residence is not a flag of convenience you plant wherever the rate looks lowest. It is a technical status with tests around where you live, how many days you spend where, where your home and family and centre of life sit, and it can be contested. Getting it wrong, or assuming it works one way when it works another, is one of the more expensive mistakes in this world. This is genuinely letting your country of tax residence drive the whole picture, and it is not a decision to make on a hunch or a rumour from the locker room.
If you take one thing from this section, take this: the cross-border position of a travelling golfer is fact-specific and needs specialist cross-border advice. I can describe the shape of the problem. Only a qualified cross-border adviser and accountant, looking at your countries, your days and your contracts, can tell you the answer.
Relocation is a normal part of an individual-sport career. Players move for weather, for practice facilities, for family, and sometimes with tax firmly in mind. Wherever the reason sits, the move reshapes the tax picture, and it should be planned before the boxes are packed, not explained afterwards.
For a player moving to the UK, there is a specific regime worth understanding, though only in outline and never as a substitute for advice. From 6 April 2025 the UK replaced the old non-domicile rules with what is known as the four-year foreign income and gains regime, usually shortened to the FIG regime. In broad terms:
For a golfer or tennis player with a genuinely international income, a four-year window in which foreign earnings sit outside UK tax can matter a great deal. But I want to be honest about the ceiling on what I can tell you: the FIG regime is highly fact-specific, the interaction with tax withheld in other countries is intricate, and whether you qualify and how to use the window well is exactly the kind of question that needs specialist cross-border advice before you rely on any of it. Read the outline above as a reason to get proper advice, not as advice itself.
The same caution applies to moving the other way, or moving anywhere. A move can change which country taxes your worldwide income, whether property you own abroad becomes taxable at home, and how endorsement income is treated. The companion pieces on foreign athletes building a career in the UK, and on appearance money and image rights, go deeper into parts of this, and all of it sits under the same rule: plan the move with a specialist before you make it.
For many touring professionals, the endorsements matter as much as the prize money, and sometimes more. Equipment deals, apparel, a sponsor’s logo on the bag or the shirt, appearance fees, ambassadorial work, and image-rights arrangements can form a large and, importantly, a steadier slice of total income than tournament results alone.
That steadiness is valuable precisely because winnings are volatile. A multi-year endorsement contract can behave a little more like a wage, giving you a base to plan against while the prize money does what prize money does. But endorsement income carries its own complications:
The practical point is to treat endorsement income with the same discipline as winnings: understand what is really yours after tax, set the tax aside, and let the reliable part support your baseline while the unreliable part tops up the reserve. And because so much of it is cross-border and technical, it belongs in the same conversation with a specialist as everything else. I will not sketch an image-rights structure in an article, because the right one depends entirely on your circumstances and the wrong one can be costly.
{{INSET-CTA-2}}
I retired from football after a serious injury. I did not get to choose the timing, and most athletes do not. A golfer’s career can be longer than a footballer’s, but it is still finite, and it can be cut short by a back that gives way, a wrist that will not heal, a loss of form that never fully returns, or simply age arriving faster than the ranking would like. The plan has to assume the earning years will end, possibly earlier than hoped, and it has to leave you secure when they do.
Security is not built by the size of the winnings. It is built by what survives them. That means turning a run of good years into assets and income that keep working long after the last competitive cheque, which is the real meaning of building a life that outlasts the earning years.
The building blocks, for a UK-resident player, sit within some allowances worth knowing:
One caution I feel strongly about. The English Professional Footballers’ Pension Scheme, funded by a club levy and not deducted from wages, is a footballers-only arrangement; there is no equivalent handed to a golfer or a tennis player. An individual-sport athlete has to build the retirement structure deliberately, because nobody is auto-enrolling you on the back of a contract. The freedom of self-employment cuts both ways: nobody takes your tax, and nobody builds your pension either.
Alongside the numbers sits the human reality of a high income meeting a high-spending lifestyle. A career that ends with form or injury does not slowly lower your outgoings to match; the house, the family, the commitments stay. Building the security that survives the day the results stop is the whole point of planning early, and it is far easier to do while the reserve is filling than after it has emptied.
There is a myth that financial advice for an athlete is about being sold a product. Done properly, it is the opposite: it is a structure and a set of conversations that let you focus on your game while someone competent watches the money.
Coordination - a travelling golfer’s finances touch an accountant, a cross-border tax specialist, an agent and sometimes lawyers in several countries; good planning keeps those people talking to each other rather than to you in isolation.
Discipline - a plan that pays you a steady wage from lumpy winnings, sets tax aside the moment it lands, and fills a reserve, only works if someone helps you hold the line in the good years.
Cross-border clarity - the residence, withholding and relief questions here are fact-specific and technical, and the value of a specialist is telling you what actually applies to your countries and contracts rather than a generic answer.
Perspective - a career that can end with an injury needs a plan that already assumes it will, so the security is built while the money is flowing, not scrambled for afterwards.
This is why serious players often seek a conversation, not a product.
I have sat on the side of the athlete, and I know how easy it is to leave the money for later because the next event is always more urgent.
None of that has to happen today. A single unhurried conversation is usually enough to see where you stand and what, if anything, is urgent.
This is not about chasing the lowest tax rate in the world, and it is not about a clever structure copied from another player. It is not about pretending a big year will repeat, and it is not about leaving the paperwork until a bill arrives.
It is about paying yourself a steady wage from unsteady winnings. It is about setting tax aside the moment it lands, because it was never yours. It is about respecting how much residence and cross-border rules shape the outcome, and getting specialist advice before you rely on any of it. And it is about turning a short career into a long security, so that the day the game hands you an ending you did not choose, the money you earned is still working for you. I did not get to choose my ending in football. You can at least choose how ready you are for yours.
Treat a large prize cheque as a year’s income arriving at once, rather than money to spend immediately. Pay yourself a fixed monthly amount you can comfortably maintain in a modest year, while directing variable winnings into a reserve. That reserve can then smooth your income during quieter periods. Tax, touring costs and savings should be covered before discretionary spending.
Most touring golfers are self-employed, so there is no employer automatically deducting tax from their income. Prize money and other earnings can therefore arrive before the relevant tax has been settled. A practical approach is to ring-fence an appropriate tax reserve as soon as income arrives. The amount required depends on residence, income, foreign tax already withheld and deductible expenses, so specialist advice is important.
Yes. A professional golfer may have tax obligations in the country where a tournament takes place as well as in their country of tax residence. Foreign tax may also be withheld at source before the prize money is paid. Tax treaties and foreign-tax-credit rules can help prevent the same income being fully taxed twice, but the treatment depends on the countries and the golfer’s individual circumstances.
From 6 April 2025, the UK replaced the former non-domicile rules with the four-year foreign income and gains (FIG) regime. Broadly, a qualifying new UK resident who has not been UK-resident for the previous ten consecutive tax years may claim relief from UK tax on qualifying foreign income and gains during their first four years of UK residence. The claim must be made annually, and UK-source income and gains remain subject to UK tax. The rules are detailed and fact-specific, so professional advice is essential before relying on the regime.
Yes. Tax residence can have a major influence on how a golfer’s worldwide income is treated. Residence is determined by specific rules and circumstances, including where you live, the amount of time you spend in different countries and, depending on the relevant rules, your wider personal and family connections. Relocating for tax reasons without understanding the residence rules can create significant problems, so the position should be assessed before moving.
Endorsement and sponsorship income can provide a more predictable financial base than tournament winnings, particularly where a golfer has a multi-year commercial agreement. However, endorsement income can also be earned across borders and may involve sponsorship, appearance obligations, image rights and territorial restrictions. The tax treatment depends on the agreement and the golfer’s circumstances, so commercial income should be reviewed alongside prize money rather than treated separately.
This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Financial planning outcomes depend on individual circumstances, residency, tax status, and objectives. Professional advice should always be sought before making financial decisions.
A focused discussion with Christophe can help you:

Every season you leave the money unstructured is a season the swings and the cross-border bills work against you rather than for you.
A single unhurried conversation with Christophe Berra can show you what, if anything, is urgent and where to begin.

Ordered list
Unordered list
Ordered list
Unordered list
In a private session with Christophe Berra, you’ll: