Rural Spain feels cheaper and calmer – until life changes. A clear guide to the real long-term financial, healthcare, and exit trade-offs of rural vs city living in Spain.

This is a div block with a Webflow interaction that will be triggered when the heading is in the view.
Moving to Saudi Arabia removes local tax friction, but it does not remove global financial consequence. For many expats, the most important outcomes are determined by how departure is structured, documented, and perceived by other systems. This article focuses on the decisions that matter before relocation, when clarity still delivers leverage.
Moving to Saudi Arabia is often framed as a financial upgrade. Higher income, no personal income tax, strong employment packages, and clear contracts create a sense that complexity has been removed rather than shifted.
That perception is understandable. Locally, Saudi Arabia is straightforward for expatriates. The complication sits elsewhere.
Most of the long-term financial consequences of a Saudi move are not created inside the Kingdom. They are shaped by what already exists before departure, and by how that departure is structured, documented, and perceived by other systems later.
This is why Saudi postings often feel uncomplicated at first, then become difficult years later.
The absence of Saudi personal income tax removes friction. That friction normally forces people to review structures, address loose ends, and seek clarity early.
Without it, many decisions are deferred.
Accounts are left untouched. Property is retained “just in case.” Pensions are ignored. Estate planning is postponed. Currency exposure accumulates quietly. Residency assumptions go untested.
None of these cause immediate problems while living in Saudi. They surface later, often on exit, return, or when assets are accessed.
Saudi does not create risk. It allows existing risk to compound unnoticed.
Relocating to Saudi Arabia is often treated as a logistical exercise. Visa, housing, schooling, employment contracts.
Financial relocation is different.
It involves understanding:
Many expats physically relocate while financially remaining anchored elsewhere, without realising it.
This gap between physical presence and financial position is where most long-term issues originate.
Tax authorities, regulators, and institutions rarely rely on explanations given years later. They rely on evidence.
They look at:
A Saudi move explained retrospectively as “permanent” may be judged very differently if it began as a fixed-term project with retained ties.
This is why clarity before departure carries more weight than justification after the fact.
{{INSET-CTA-1}}
Some elements of a Saudi move remain flexible. Others become very difficult to unwind.
What often becomes fixed early:
What is usually easier to adjust later:
Understanding this distinction helps prioritise attention before relocation.
One of the most common misunderstandings among incoming Saudi expats is the belief that tax residency ends on the day they leave their home country.
In most systems, residency is not determined by a single action. It is assessed as a position, based on facts, behaviour, and intention over time.
Saudi residency usually begins when you arrive and take up employment. Home-country residency often ends only when specific conditions are met, and those conditions vary by jurisdiction.
This creates an overlap period where:
That overlap is where most problems start.
Many expats assume that physical absence from their home country settles residency automatically.
In practice, many tax systems look beyond presence and consider:
A Saudi move linked to a defined project or fixed-term contract is often treated differently from an open-ended relocation, even if the individual’s intention evolves later.
What matters is how the move looks at the time it happens, not how it is described years later.
Tax authorities rarely accept intention at face value. They infer it from actions.
Examples include:
Saudi authorities do not test intention for tax purposes. Other jurisdictions do, often retrospectively.
This is why clarity before departure matters more than explanations after the fact.
How your Saudi role is structured can influence how residency is assessed elsewhere.
Factors that sometimes matter include:
These details are often invisible to the individual at the time, but visible to tax authorities later.
Saudi does not scrutinise this for expatriates. Home countries often do.
Not all Saudi moves are viewed equally.
Short-term assignments, rotations, or secondments may be treated as:
Open-ended relocations with no defined return date are more likely to be treated as genuine departures, provided actions align with that narrative.
The issue is not what the contract says. It is how the overall pattern appears.
For many expats, family considerations carry more weight in residency analysis than employment.
Where:
can outweigh where income is earned.
A professional working in Saudi while a family remains elsewhere may face very different residency treatment to someone who relocates as a household.
Saudi does not assess this. Other jurisdictions frequently do.
Certain financial ties are often underestimated in residency assessments, including:
None of these prevent a Saudi move. But together, they can undermine the perception of departure.
This is why residency is rarely settled by one factor alone.
Some issues remain flexible after a Saudi move. Others do not.
Often hard to fix later:
Often easier to adjust later:
Understanding this distinction helps prioritise attention before departure.
Many expats question the need for documentation when no local tax is payable.
The answer lies in future scrutiny.
Documentation helps demonstrate:
Saudi does not demand this. Other authorities may, years later.
Many expats assume that if something is missed before departure, it can be corrected later.
Sometimes that is true. Often it is not.
The issue is not that authorities penalise people for moving to Saudi Arabia. The issue is that facts become fixed once a move happens. Residency analysis, intention, and the character of a departure are judged based on what was true at the time, not what is convenient to explain later.
Saudi’s tax-neutral environment makes it easy to delay engagement. That delay is often what creates risk.
{{INSET-CTA-2}}
These scenarios are illustrative, not predictive. They reflect common patterns seen among expats moving to Saudi Arabia.
Scenario 1: The confident departure
A professional leaves their home country believing residency has ended automatically. A property remains available, family stays behind temporarily, and the move is framed as a two-year project. Years later, the original assumptions are tested when assets are accessed.
Scenario 2: The short-term contract that became long-term
An expat accepts a Saudi role on a fixed contract, retains most ties “just in case,” and delays formal decisions. The posting extends, but the original departure narrative never changes.
Scenario 3: The family-first move
A family relocates fully to Saudi, but financial structures remain unchanged. Over time, investment and pension decisions no longer align with reality, despite the move itself being genuine.
In each case, the challenge is not Saudi law. It is the gap between assumption and structure.
This checklist is designed to prompt awareness, not urgency.
Before relocating to Saudi Arabia, it is worth being clear on:
Not every item requires immediate action. Every item benefits from understanding.
Many expats associate financial planning with products, strategies, or optimisation.
That is rarely what is needed before a Saudi move.
What matters most is:
Saudi Arabia offers opportunity precisely because it removes local tax friction. That same removal increases the importance of getting foundations right.
For expats relocating to Saudi Arabia, professional support is usually focused on:
This is not about aggressive planning. It is about avoiding avoidable mistakes.
Moving to Saudi Arabia is often financially attractive.
The biggest risks rarely arise in Saudi itself. They arise in the space between:
Clarity before departure almost always delivers more value than correction after arrival.
Not usually. Most tax systems assess residency based on behaviour, ties, and intention over time. Physical departure alone is rarely sufficient.
Because it removes the pressure to review structures early. Decisions are often deferred until options are narrower and facts are fixed.
How the move was characterised, whether a home remained available, family location at departure, and employment structure are often hard to revisit later.
Yes. In many jurisdictions, where a spouse and children live can outweigh where income is earned.
Because other authorities may review your position years later. Documentation helps demonstrate timing, intention, and consistency.
Callum L. Murphy ACSI is an experienced international financial planner who leads a team of advisors and associates at Skybound Wealth Management’s London office, operating exclusively in Saudi Arabia. He joined Skybound in April 2019, starting his career in the Geneva office before transitioning to his current role.
This article is provided for general educational purposes only. It does not constitute tax, legal, investment, or financial advice. No personal recommendations are made. Tax treatment depends on individual circumstances and may change. Regulations vary by jurisdiction.
Moving to Saudi simplifies local administration. It does not automatically:
Clarity before departure usually matters more than explanation after the fact.

Problems linked to Saudi moves rarely appear immediately. They tend to surface when:
Early awareness reduces the need for later correction.

Ordered list
Unordered list
Ordered list
Unordered list
A move to Saudi Arabia often feels straightforward at the start. A short discussion before or early in a relocation can help you: